Software concurrency refers to systems with multiple logical threads of execution. Concurrent systems can improve performance and responsiveness through parallelism. However, concurrency introduces challenges like race conditions and deadlocks. The design must address constructing correct concurrent programs through synchronization, mutual exclusion, and thread safety. Architectural choices significantly impact achieving concurrency goals.

The distribution of components refers to allocating components to physical nodes across a network or hierarchical hardware topology. As a simplistic example, one component of a system might run on Server A, and another on Server B. Distributed systems aim for characteristics like performance, scalability, availability and reliability. However, latency, communications and fault tolerance need to be designed carefully in such systems. Location transparency and middleware can be used to help mask distribution from components, reducing individual component complexity.

Software assurance involves designing systems for safety, security and reliability. Security aims to protect confidentiality, integrity and availability of information assets. Safety is freedom from catastrophically dangerous states. Reliability ensures continuity of correct service. Assurance requires rigorous analysis of risks, formal verification of critical properties and designing fail-safe behaviors. High assurance systems can require extensive certification against stringent standards.

Read more about software design in the Software Engineer Book of Knowledge (SWEBOK)

DOWNLOAD SWEBOK

---

The software design process leverages various strategies and methods to transform requirements into an implementable system design. These approaches provide philosophies, techniques, and tools to tackle the inherent complexity of large software systems.

General software design strategies and methods establish high-level approaches and mindsets. Top-down architectural design starts with the big picture and progressively refines it into details. It provides overall structure and organization early. Bottom-up architectural design begins with basic low-level components to incrementally build up complex systems. This supports experimentation and prototyping. Step-wise refinement enhances top-down and bottom-up methods by formally adding details in stages. Design patterns reuse expertise by customizing flexible templated designs for each context. Iterative and agile methods welcome changing requirements and continuous feedback.

Fundamental strategies like separation of concerns and abstraction permeate the design process. Separation of concerns divides problems to limit complexity and scope. Abstraction focuses on essentials while ignoring distracting details. These universal techniques help break down problems into manageable pieces that can be independently analyzed.

Specific system design blueprints leverage different concepts to drive the decomposition and organization of system architectures. For example, structured design methodically breaks down systems into functional components. Data-centered design transforms data structures from input to output forms. Object-oriented design encapsulates data and behaviors into reusable classes. Component-based design assembles systems from collections of reusable building blocks with standardized interfaces. Aspect-oriented design localizes crosscutting concerns into modular units. Event-driven design responds to internal and external trigger events. Constraint-based design prunes infeasible design branches. Service-oriented design exposes capabilities through service interfaces, and user-centered design involves iterative refinement based on user feedback.

Blending complementary methods mitigates the weaknesses and leverages the strengths of individual approaches. The problem context shapes the choice of suitable strategies while the design team crafts appropriate solutions justified by reasoned arguments and experience. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the software design manifests in the quality of the final operational system.

---

Rigorously analyzing and evaluating software design quality is crucial for preventing downstream defects. Design reviews provide methodical assessment of the design for completeness, consistency, feasibility and maintainability. Reviews help point out issues early when less expensive to fix. They ensure quality by being comprehensive and independent. Reviews offer feedback to designers and promote shared understanding with stakeholders.

Essential design qualities transcend specific functions. Attributes like traceability, verifiability, validity, conceptual integrity, correctness, robustness, understandability, modifiability, reusability and testability contribute to a high-quality design.

• Traceability enables tracking design elements back to originating requirements.
• Verifiability means designs permit formal proof of critical properties while validity indicates the design specifications match user expectations.
• Conceptual integrity is a function that reflects unity and coherence across the design. Correctness means the design is free of harmful logical flaws.
• Robustness involves resilience against misuse and volatility. Understandability denotes clarity of rationale.
• Modifiability supports incremental change while reusability allows leveraging common features. The last function of testability simplifies confirming proper functioning.

Various techniques can analyze and evaluate software design quality. Some of these techniques are:

• Inspections involve methodical manual examination of design documents. Static analysis evaluates structural and semantic design properties mathematically.
• Model checking algorithmically verifies logical correctness against specifications while simulation observes executable models of dynamic behavior.
• Prototyping provides hands-on interaction with simplified experimental versions.
• Complexity analysis quantifies intricate dependencies and scenario evaluation assesses fitness based on operational vignettes. Lastly, requirements tracing maps design elements back to original needs.

Automated analysis complements human judgment and verification confirms the design adheres to requirements and constraints, ensuring the solution matches the problem. Verifying software design prevents wasted effort constructing dysfunctional systems. Further, rigorous design evaluation surfaces discrepancies early when they are less expensive and less complex to resolve.

---

Software design translates both the functional and nonfunctional requirements into a blueprint for the software system. Well-designed systems meet functional and quality needs. Design acts as the interface between problem space and solution space. Key strategies like abstraction and separation of concerns manage complexity. Various methods drive the decomposition and organization of architectures. The overall design quality is crucial for success – attributes like robustness, understandability and modifiability create lasting systems. Rigorous design analysis and evaluation using techniques like inspections, prototyping and requirements tracing help to prevent defects. The application of design thinking involves understanding user needs, exploring solutions, rapid iteration and continuous feedback, which can all further improve the end result. Good design makes software understandable, flexible, and reusable. Insufficient design leads to technical debt and brittle systems. Furthermore, adhering to a full software design process can ensure that design decisions are clearly documented, which enables knowledge transfer and shared understanding, further ensuring the longevity and sustainability of the software being developed.

Read more about software design in the Software Engineer Book of Knowledge (SWEBOK)

DOWNLOAD SWEBOK